| |
The making of an image In
every issue we intend to include a photographer's account of making an
image. We will ask him or her why he/she made the choices he/she
did—what
alternatives were considered, and what constrained the range of choices.
We'd like to include one or two other shots of the same scene,
and learn why the featured image was preferred.
Shortly
after crossing into Kentucky from West Virginia I saw an
oil refinery. Large industrial structures are among my favorites
subjects, so when I saw the X (the crisscross) of the materials-handling
conveyors I was reminded of a photograph and a later oil painting by Charles
Sheeler of a Ford plant near Detroit, taken in 1927.
I carry a lot of those kinds of images around in my head—the
product of looking closely at photography books for
many years, I suppose. I parked on a narrow shoulder of the
busy
highway
near the plant, and had limited room
to
place
my
tripod and
set
up
my 4x5
camera. There was no question that the X was going to be
a central element in the image I was about to make. At the
time
I was working in black-and-white,
using Kodak T-Max100,
a fairly slow film. I had just made a vertical shot when
a security guard from the refinery drove up and asked me
what I was doing;
he probably thought I was an environmental activitist, but
knew I was on a public highway and he had no authority to
tell me to move on. He did tell me I was parked in a dangerous
place. Shortly thereafter, two
large oil trucks
came out of the plant gate and buzzed me, coming much closer
than necessary to my tripod, so I decided that I needed several
more shots, this
time
a few horizontal
ones. I determined to take my damn time at it, too. When
a
third truck passed even closer, I concluded that two shots
were probably
enough.
You can see by the shadows that the light was right overhead—for me the worst
time of day for picture-taking. But I had to be at Fort Knox in a couple of
hours, so could not just sit around.
—FLG
|
No. 0 January 2006 
The decision as to
where to stand and what to point my camera at was easy—I wanted
to be where I could get the most straight-on view of the crisscrossed
conveyors. So the real question was
how
much
of
the rest
of the facility
did I want to include? I could move in a few yards or use a little longer
lens (they don't make zoom lenses for view cameras) and narrow the view,
or I could use a wide angle lens and take in more. I could not move back
without getting hit by a car or truck. I decided to make one exposure
(and a backup) with my normal lens, then exchange that lens for a little
longer one that would move in tighter on the conveyors.
The single power line was a distraction; several
lines would have been fine—maybe even add something to the image—but a single
one bothered me. So I moved a few feet, changed lenses and made the shot you
see
on the left.
Is it better than the one above? That's a matter
of taste.
I like them both, but the power line still irritates me. Why not move in even
tighter, as in the cropped image below? That's another possibility, but the black
stack seemed a bit too prominent, perhaps because it is in the center of
the
image. I had to make large prints of both and stare at them a while before I
was sure I'd made the right choice.

|