feature | activities | choices | critique | gallery | history | reviews | links | glossary | about
 

Welcome

This is the first issue of a website devoted to approaching photography as an art form that (mostly) embraces the traditional canons of drawing and painting—which is to say there is an emphasis here on line, shape, color, light, perspective, texture, and so on. We appreciate that there is much more to photography than that, but an awareness of traditions— from Lascaux to Rauschenberg—may be useful to beginning and intermediate photographers as they explore and experiment. There will certainly be treatment of the craft and technical aspects, but our focus will be on composition in the very broadest sense of that term. There are two basic questions we will pose—What do you point your camera at? and Where do you stand? When one addresses those questions many of the other decisions are fairly well determined. We invite you to explore this issue and tell us what you think.
                                                                                                            —FLG



Shadows

Advice on lighting and exposure abounds, in books and on the web, but there is surprisingly little discussion of shadow, other than the recommendation to expose for the shadows and print for the highlights. Ansel Adams' Zone system says to place the shadows in Zone III. I suppose much of that is useful, but it doesn't strike me as particularly thoughtful; it assumes there is a recipe or process to follow when shadows form a significant part of an image. There are many situations when the midtones are essential and I'm quite willing to let the shadows go black if I have to. In this issue I'd like to explore the use of shadow.



Let us begin by noting the distinction between (1) a shadow as a shape or form, (2) shadows that provide texture or depth to an image, and (3) areas that are dark (in shadow) because they receive less light than other areas. The image above might be used to illustrate all three, but that would be a stretch. It seems to me that only the third is pertinent here. Are the shadowed areas in Zone III? Some of them are, but many are totally black. Is that a flaw in the image? I don't think so. Shadows can cause problems for the photographer when they fall in the wrong places, or when the exposure is not right and there is no detail at all in large sections of a print (that's why Adams recommends placing shadow areas in Zone III), but that is not the case here. Shadows can create discontinuities that break up a form, as we'll see in an image below, but they may also give definition and depth to a subject.
                                                                                                         CONTINUE


No. 1 April 2006

   Photography is not simply a craft
   or art, but a means of seeing and    thinking about our world.


We plan on publishing semi-monthly, with each issue based on an important aspect of composition—like the treatment of shadows here—with images from our own work and from a few contributors. There will be links to other photographers and artists, and an activity or assignment whereby one might practice and gain at least an understanding of the several dimensions of using shadows, or whatever is the topic for that issue.

Our primary audience is anyone seriously trying to learn how to make better images. If photography is not your passion (or at least one of them) we suspect there will not be much here for you. We invite participation from instructors and students, and expect to feature the work of both in subsequent issues.
We anticipate the emphasis and perhaps the breadth or depth of our treatment will change over time, as we get a better understanding of the needs and preferences of our audience.

We are going to use this website, very frankly, to experiment with a variety of instructional and presentation capabilities, including audio and video conferencing, threaded discussions, podcasts, and as much interactivity as seems appropriate for the topic. We're still in the process of setting up some of that software, but we hope you'll be able to participate more extensively by the summer months.

We have some prejudices and you might as well be apprised of them now. You are unlikely to see images featuring sunsets, birds, insects, cute pets, or rock stars and celebrities here. There is more emphasis and space given to black-and-white images than many people are used to; black-and-white is not better or purer, it's just different and equally worthy of attention. We believe that much can be learned from studying other images, including painting and drawing, as well as the nineteenth century photographic images that make up the History section of this website, and throughout we will make reference to art and photography we see as relevant.

One of the unanswered questions implicitly raised by the very existence of this site is whether photography can be taught. We have argued both sides of that issue, without resolving it. But photography can be learned, and that is the proposition to which we are dedicated.


The image in the title graphic is of the ruins of Lowry pueblo, near Cortez, Colorado. The one on the left is of a hallway in Mexico. That image, and the spiky plant at the head of this column were taken by Alison Jones and are copyrighted by her. You can find more of her work at www.alisonjonesphoto.com.