| |
Assignments
Each issue we'll devise an activity or assignment
to provide some practice in an aspect of photography related to
the feature article. We have two such activities here. On this
page we suggest you find and shoot several examples of converging
lines, and on the following page, we'll let you see for yourself
the difference that even a limited amount of control can make to
your images.
Find at least three examples of converging parallels—preferably
both a vertical and a horizontal—somewhere in your general
neighborhood. Buildings are always available, but try to find something
else
as well. Railroad tracks, power lines, fence posts—any repetitive
form that is lined up at regular intervals will do nicely. [Download
a worksheet with the following
instructions.]
Objective: This activity is designed to provide experience in controlling
the convergence of parallel lines and shapes. You can do this by
(1) where you stand, (2) tilting or keeping the camera level, (3)
changing the zoom or focal length of your lens, and by a combination
of all three. In this assignment you will shoot from at least three
places: very close, a medium distance, and way back.
The first step is to try is to exaggerate the convergence as much
as possible. It is easiest to demonstrate this with a tall building,
but it could also be done with a row of telephone poles, for example.
We suggest you select a building—a church with a belfry or
tower would be a good subject, but any structure 3 or more stories
high will work fine. Here's the basic concept: the closer you are
to your subject the greater the convergence and/or distortion.
Exaggerating the convergence:
Stand 10-12 feet from the base of the building about on the centerline
of the structure and point your camera up. Adjust the zoom so the
entire building (if possible) just fits in the viewfinder of your
camera. You should orient the camera to create a vertical image,
and be sure to get the top of the structure in the viewfinder.
You may not be able to get the entire building in, even when zoomed
out to the maximum, but don't be concerned about that—just
be sure to get the top of the structure. If the building is generally
symmetrical, the left side of your image should be very much like
the right half.
Try several variations of that close-in shot. Move to a corner of
the building and take another shot (although this one may not be
as symmetrical), and then try it from the other corner.
Minimizing the convergence:
Now move across the street, or at least 60 feet from the building.
Stand in a line with the center of the building and zoom in or
out so the top of the building comes almost to the top of the viewfinder.
Take two shots here: one where the building fills the viewfinder
as much as possible. You may have to tilt the camera up, especially
if its a very tall building. That's the first shot. For the second
shot we want you to keep the camera level (this is extremely important)
and zoom out until you can get the entire building in the viewfinder,
even if it means that there is a lot of foreground in the viewfinder
and the building does not fill the viewfinder. Keep the top of
the building near the top of the viewfinder and take that shot.
When you think you have made those two exposures you are ready to
move back to the third position, This location is not an arbitrary
distance but back just far enough to to eliminate any remaining convergence.
That will depend on your lens and the height of the structure, so
move back as much as you need to. You may have to work at an angle
that is off to the left or right of the centerline in order to get
back far enough. That's OK, as long as you made a couple of pictures
from close up and from a middle distance from a corner in line with
this long distance shot.
If you have a wide-angle or telephoto lens and a few extra minutes
you might want to shoot three more pictures with that lens, one at
each of the positions.
Conclusion:
You probably noticed that the shape of the building in the more distant
shots was much different than those you took when you were at a
middle distance, and certainly vastly different than those taken
up close. You can eliminate the converging lines of even the tallest
structure if you get far enough away from it, but then you may
need a long lens to get an image of reasonable size. Even a 80-210
mm lens, which is relatively common on today's digital cameras,
will enable you to minimize convergence to quite an extent. Or,
to produce a good undistorted image of the building, you may have
to crop and enlarge one of your distant photos—there is likely
to be an excess of foreground in the pictures you took from the
longest distance unless you had a telephoto lens on the camera.
You don't have to print every image, but we suggest you print at
least one from each distance and line them up side-by-side. That
comparison will show you more than we could tell.
Select
the most dramatic transformations—those may not be the shots
you like the best, but ones where there is the most distortion.
Then pay special attention to where you stood relative to the subject,
which lens you used, and what your aperture setting was, as that
will affect your depth-of-field.
—FLG
If you would
like to submit any of your images to the editors of this website,
we'll select a few that illustrate the concept of converging parallels
very well. One of our editors will probably make some comment--and
we'll set up a means to enable others to do so as well on our Forums
page (coming in a later issue). |
No.
0 January 2006
Photography
is not simply a craft
or art, but a means of seeing and
thinking about our world.

Railroad
tracks are a cliché, but that's no reason not to shoot them.
Sometimes you want to point your camera towards the sun to maximize
the reflection
off the tracks. Be sure to keep your camera pointed down and use
a lens hood. There may be times such as this where the photographer
wanted to include the old RR station and a bridge, but the top
quarter of the image might be cropped out, leaving us with quite
a different image.
Shot for the assignment:

This was shot
a few feet from the corner of the building. Notice how all the
vertical edges of the building converge. Move your cursor over
the image to see the verticals.
The photo above
was taken from the street.
One can see some convergence in the left corner of the building,
but there is very little. If the building had been centered
in the viewfinder, the camera would need to be tilted up, and that
would have introduced some convergence.
In the image below the photographer
moved back another 30 feet and
took
a horizontal
view.
There
is no noticeable vertical convergence. One needs to crop the foreground
of course.

|